Call : 0086-21-58386256

manupatra buy supreme urt judgments online rs only

Judgment Supreme Court of India, Tribunal judgment order ...

Further, you can avail a simple subscription plan to access Supreme Court latest order and this is how you can access the order either on a daily or yearly basis. We are also the most reliable name for content and materials concerned with Indian Acts and Judgment. The database is detailed and exhaustive with all orders from Supreme Court.


The Court must be careful to make allowance for imperfect recollection and the effect of careless pronunciation and speech on the part not only of the person seeking to buy under the trade description, but also of the shop assistant ministering to that person's wants." (Emphasis supplied) 24. I have compared the two marks.

Important Supreme Court Cases on Maintenance Rights ...

The High Court adjudged, fixed the maintenance payable to the respondent, under the Section 23(2) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, at Rs.250 subject to a limit of 25% per month of the income as determined by the income-tax authorities, and Rs. 150 as the maintenance of the daughter.

Easiest and Fastest Sources for Accessing Supreme Court ...

The "Supreme Court Reports" containing cases determined by the Supreme Court of India is published weekly under the authority of Supreme Court by the Controller of Publications, Government of India. "All India Reporter" and "Supreme Court Cases" are other two such journals which have been covering Supreme Court judgments for decades.


Naraindas Revachand Hamrajani through Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr. 30.09.1997: Naranjan Singh vs. Kuldip Singh and Ors. 09.12.1997: Narendra Kumar and Anr. vs. Yarenissa and Ors. 12.01.1996: Naresh Kumar and Anr. vs. Registrar, High Court of Punjab and Haryana and Ors. 06.11.1998

Union Of India Etc. Etc vs K.V. Jankiraman Etc. Etc on 27 ...

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SAWANT, J. Civil Appeals Nos. 3019/87, 3020/87 and 3016/88 arise out of the judgment dated March 2, 1987 deliv- ered by the Full Bench of the Central Administrative Tribu- nal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal').

Online Legal Resources

Search of case law of Supreme Court or Any of the High Courts: Exercise your option from the drop down box. How to see complete Head note: When you search case law, only few lines appear on screen. You can see the entire head note by just clicking at `Details'.

Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka

Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, a 1989 Supreme Court of India case, occurred when the Government of Karnataka issued a notification that permitted the private medical colleges in the State of Karnataka to charge exorbitant tuition fees from the students admitted other than the "Government seat quota". Miss Mohini Jain, a medical aspirant student filed a petition in Supreme Court challenging ...


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4927 of 2010 ... on the units at the rate of Rs. 4/- per unit and earned a dividend of Rs. ... Court vide its impugned judgment dated 8.8.2008, hence this civil appeal.

Man Kaur(Dead)By Lrs vs Hartar Singh Sangha on 5 October, 2010

Supreme Court of India. Man Kaur(Dead)By Lrs vs Hartar Singh Sangha on 5 October, 2010 ... After appreciating the evidence, the trial court by judgment dated 15.3.1983, decreed the suit. ... Therefore, even if breach by the appellant - vendor was made out, the remedy of respondent - purchaser was only to get Rs.20,000/- and not for specific ...


Top. High Court of Delhi. Ram Charan and Ors. v. New Delhi, Y.M.C.A. MANU/DE/2024/2017. 20.07.2017. Civil. A right of a licencee is only to enter and exit licenced premises and he has no legal possession which can be protected


The Appellant challenged the judgment of the High Court to the extent that, ex-gratia payment of Rs. 7.5 lakhs was not awarded in her favour. The Respondent, Union of India has also filed an appeal questioning the judgment of the High Court in so far as it relates to the declaration that, the Appellant is entitled to the Liberalised Family ...

Essar Steel verdict: How the SC ruling is a game

Nov 21, 2019· The recent Supreme Court Judgement on Essar Steel is a similar landmark judgement and affirms basic principles of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. A few of these are: 1.

New Features

If you wish to simultaneously access Manupatra on the web and on the App, you will require to sign up for a separate Manupatra App Sign In license @ Rs 5000/- p.a per license. IP users get Complimentary access to the Manupatra App within their campus, if they access the App over wi-fi using the same network(IP) configured to use Manupatra online.

Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2018

Adultery was only a tort for 7 which damages were payable to the husband, given his proprietary interest in his wife.12 This tort is adverted to by a 1904 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in Charles A. Tinker v. Frederick L. Colwell, 193 US 473 (1904), as follows:

The Lawyer's Digest: Supreme Court Judgments passed in ...

Jun 07, 2020· In M.E. Shivalingamurthy v.Central Bureau of Investigation, Bengaluru, the Court relied on the principles laid down in P Vijayan, Sudershan Chakkar, and Debendranath Padhi to hold that at the stage of discharge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the accused can rely only on materials produced by the prosecution. The Court stated that the established principle is ...

India Law Legal Database

Customer Support TOLL FREE NO : 1-800-103-3550. PHONE: +91-120-4014524. SMS MANU to 56161 for a call back

India Law Legal Database

Case Laws of Supreme Court (1950 - till current) Case laws of Patna High Court (1919 - till current) ... Get access to Full Site of Manupatra database. Pay Rs 999/- for a day and access the site for 24 hours or till you reach the threshold of access allowed. View 25 documents (including judgments…

manupatra buy supreme urt judgments online rs only

Manupatra Buy Supreme Court Judgments online Rs 100 . Mr G A Senior Advocate of The Supreme Court vs The Hon ble Chief Justice and Judges of The High Court of Judicature at Bombay 27 05 1954 Muir Mills Co Ltd vs Suti Mills Mazdoor Union Kanpur 19 11 1954 Nar Singh and Anr vs The State of Uttar Pradesh 05 05 1954 Narain Swadeshi Weaving Mills vs The Commissioner of Excess Profits


A. Manoharan and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. 14.02.2008: A. Mohammed Yusuf Khan and Ors. vs. K. Muthu: 25.02.2008: A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad and Ors. vs ...


May 02, 2017· LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS IN TRADEMARKS LAW. 1. Yahoo!, Inc. v Akash Arora & Anr [1999 (19) PTC 201 (Del)] :-The first decision on the protection of IP rights on the Internet.. In what is known till date as a Landmark judgment in cybersquatting, the Delhi High Court held that a domain name served the same function as a trademark and was therefore entitled to equal protection.


A.C. Arulappan vs. Smt. Ahalya Naik: 10.08.2001: A.I.I.M.S. Students Union vs. A.I.I.M.S. and Ors. 24.08.2001: A.K. Joshi vs. Union of India (UOI) 15.10.2001